PE-Viability comments
KUKURUGA@medmail.med.umich.edu
Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:51:25 -0500 (EST)
General responses for the PE-Viability issue. . .
1) PI works well as a viability marker, as most know.
With a low concentration of PI, it's easily separated from PE.
2) 7AAD also works well, as one other message indicated,
particularily since the resultant fluorescence is >650.
Both are excluded from live cells, and serve well to detect
damaged or dead cells.
On FDA . . .
1) while FDA is a good indicator of esterase activity, it's not
necessarily the best "viability" indicator. The free fluorescein
resulting from the metabolism of FDA can readily leak out of cells,
thus indicating false "dead," and also can stain non-specifically,
thus adding to background -- so the carboxy form is recommended.
2) I've seen a similar compound -- Molecular Probes' calceim AM
viability dye -- actively "pumped" from cells expressing
p-Glycoprotein 170, so "green-negative cells" are not necesarily
"dead." Usually, when dyes such as FDA are employed as a viability
marker, PI has been used (quite necessarily) in combination to
confirm the results.
MAK.
Mark A. KuKuruga
University of Michigan Flow Cytometry
kukuruga@medmail.med.umich.edu
CD-ROM Vol 3 was produced by Monica M. Shively and other staff at the
Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories and distributed free of charge
as an educational service to the cytometry community.
If you have any comments please direct them to
Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director,
PUCL, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.
Phone: (765)-494-0757;
FAX(765) 494-0517;
Web
http://www.cyto.purdue.edu
, EMAIL
cdrom3@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu