re: data display

Deborah Berglund (umbbd@gemini.oscs.montana.edu)
Tue, 30 Sep 1997 12:49:01 -0600 (MDT)

Yes, Alice. I am in complete agreement with you.

The contour plots available on the old FACScan with its archaic software
is abysmal. Long live dot plots.......

Deb Berglund

On 29 Sep 1997, Alice L. Givan wrote:

>
> I know that dot plots can be misleading for all the reasons that Mario Roederer
> describes --- BUT I also know that, by choice of the contouring algorithm, you
> can make a contour plot look any way you want: shoulders on peaks can be
> emphasized or can be made to disappear, double peaks can be made to look like
> single peaks, etc etc etc.. These problems are not solved by showing the dots
> that are below the contouring threshold, as they relate to the levels of
> coutours above the threshold. Dot plots can be misleading, but contour plots
> are a can of worms. OK Mario (and anyone else) -- looking forward to your
> response!
> Alice
>
> Alice L. Givan
> Englert Cell Analysis Laboratory
> Dartmouth Medical School
> Lebanon, New Hampshire
> NH 03756 USA
> tel 603-650-7661
> fax 603-650-6130
> e-mail givan@dartmouth.edu
>
>
>