Re: CyChrome & PerCP
Paul J. Jansen (zinetti@acpub.duke.edu)
Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
Well, we have used both CyChrome and PcP, and we like PcP. CyChrome was
very bright and made compensation a nightmare, whereas PcP was dimmer,
yet this resulted in much easier compensation. BD FACscan one laser is
the machine we use.
CAVEAT: PcP is VERY expensive.
cya
BZ
ps your milage may vary, I was told that noone in thier right mind would
want to use the "dimmer" PcP, yet the results we get are very nice thank you.
On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, steven micko wrote:
> Date: Wed, 04 Sep 96 09:02:46 EST
> From: steven micko <steven_micko@email.eushc.org>
> To: Cytometry Mailing List <cytometry@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu>
> Subject: CyChrome & PerCP
>
>
>
> Can anyone give me information on the chemical structure (in a general
> way), excitation/emission information, and stability information on the
> two fluorochromes, CyChrome (Pharmingen) and PerCP (B-D)? I'm not
> interested in violating anybody's proprietary information. I just want to
> know what I'm dealing with. So far all I have been able to get is
> marketing stuff (i.e. ours is better than theirs).
>
> Is there anything in the literature?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Steve Micko
> Emory Hospital
> Atlanta
>
CD ROM Vol 2 was produced by staff at the Purdue University Cytometry Laboratories
and distributed free of charge as an educational service to the cytometry community.
If you have any comments please direct them to Dr. J. Paul Robinson, Professor & Director, PUCL,
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Phone:(317) 494-0757; FAX (317) 494-0517; Web http://www.cyto.purdue.edu
EMAIL robinson@flowcyt.cyto.purdue.edu
